Categories
Uncategorized

Anti-Lock Braking Systems

Anti-lock Braking System (ABS) is one of the most significant safety advancements in the automotive industry. This technology prevents the wheels from locking up, allowing the driver to maintain steering control and significantly reduce the risk of skidding.

What is ABS?

ABS is a vehicle safety system that helps prevent the wheels from locking up during hard braking, which can lead to a loss of steering control and increased stopping distances. The system allows the driver to maintain full control over the vehicle during braking, especially in emergency situations or when braking on slippery roads, such as on snow, ice, or rain-soaked surfaces.

The primary purpose of ABS is to ensure that the wheels do not stop rotating while the car is braking, allowing the driver to continue steering and avoid skidding. This is achieved by continuously modulating brake pressure on each wheel, ensuring that the wheels don’t lock up, even during hard or emergency braking.

ABS was first developed in the late 1960s as a response to concerns about vehicle safety during emergency braking. Early forms of ABS were initially found in aircraft, but it wasn’t long before the technology was adapted for use in automobiles. The first car to feature a rudimentary version of ABS was the Mercedes-Benz 300SL in 1978, equipped with a system called “Teves” developed by the Bosch company.

As the technology developed, it became increasingly sophisticated, and by the mid-1980s, ABS was offered in production vehicles from several manufacturers, especially in higher-end models. In 1990, Bosch introduced a more refined version of ABS, incorporating electronic control that vastly improved braking response. By the late 1990s, ABS began to become a standard feature in many vehicles, and in the 2000s, it was included in most new cars as part of standard safety equipment.

Today, ABS systems have evolved into highly complex and integrated safety technologies that work in tandem with other systems like traction control and electronic stability control (ESC) to provide even better vehicle handling and safety.

How ABS Works: The Technology Behind It

ABS is fundamentally an electronic system that uses sensors, a hydraulic pump, and electronic controls to manage the braking process. Let’s break down how ABS functions in detail.

1. Components of ABS

ABS relies on several key components that work together to monitor wheel speed and control brake pressure during an emergency stop.

  • Wheel Speed Sensors: Each wheel has a sensor that monitors its rotation speed. These sensors send continuous data to the ABS control unit (ECU). When a wheel begins to decelerate rapidly or is about to lock up, the sensor detects this and sends a signal to the ECU.
  • ABS Control Unit (ECU): The ECU processes the data from the wheel speed sensors and determines whether or not a wheel is about to lock up. If the system detects a potential lock-up situation, it activates the ABS system to modulate the brake pressure, preventing the wheel from stopping completely.
  • Hydraulic Valves: Each wheel is equipped with a set of valves that regulate brake fluid pressure. The ECU uses these valves to reduce or increase the braking force applied to each wheel in real time.
  • Pump: In case the pressure needs to be restored after it is released, the pump will reactivate the system by restoring pressure to the brakes. It works in concert with the valves to adjust brake force to each wheel.
  • Brake Pedal: The brake pedal is the interface through which the driver activates the system. While the pedal feels normal under regular braking conditions, during ABS activation, the pedal may vibrate or pulsate as the system modulates brake pressure to prevent wheel lock-up.

2. The ABS Process: Step-by-Step

  • Wheel Lock-Up Detection: If the driver applies too much brake force too quickly, the wheels may begin to lock up. The wheel speed sensors detect this by comparing the rotational speed of the wheels to the actual speed of the car.
  • Pressure Modulation: If the sensors detect that a wheel is about to lock, the ECU signals the hydraulic valves to reduce the brake pressure to that wheel. The system temporarily releases pressure to the affected wheel to prevent it from locking.
  • Pulsation and Reapplication of Pressure: If the wheel continues to decelerate too quickly, the ECU rapidly re-applies and releases the brake pressure in quick bursts. This pulsing action, which the driver may feel through the brake pedal, continues until the wheel regains traction.
  • Restoration of Control: During this rapid cycle of brake pressure modulation, the driver can still steer the vehicle, which is a significant advantage over traditional braking systems where a locked wheel leads to a loss of steering control. The system continues to pulse until the vehicle comes to a stop or the driver releases the brake pedal.

Types of ABS Systems

ABS technology has evolved into several configurations, depending on the vehicle’s design and intended use. The main types of ABS systems include:

1. Four-Wheel ABS

This is the most common type of ABS in passenger vehicles. It uses individual wheel sensors, an ECU, and hydraulic valves for each wheel. The system ensures that all four wheels are monitored and that the correct brake force is applied to each one during an emergency stop.

2. Front-Wheel ABS

In some older or lower-cost vehicles, ABS may only be installed on the front wheels. In these systems, only the front two wheels are monitored for lock-up, and only those brakes are modulated to prevent skidding. This type of system is less advanced than four-wheel ABS and may not be as effective in preventing loss of control during emergency braking.

3. Rear-Wheel ABS

Although less common, some vehicles, particularly rear-wheel-drive vehicles, may be equipped with rear-wheel ABS. These systems monitor the rear axle only and apply the same principles of brake modulation to the rear wheels to prevent lock-up and loss of control.

4. Cornering ABS (EBD)

Modern vehicles with advanced electronic stability control (ESC) or cornering ABS also incorporate Electronic Brakeforce Distribution (EBD). EBD optimizes the brake balance between the front and rear axles, adjusting the brake force based on the weight distribution of the car and driving conditions. This ensures better control in cornering and when carrying heavy loads.

Benefits of ABS

1. Enhanced Vehicle Control

The most important benefit of ABS is the ability to maintain steering control during hard braking. In non-ABS vehicles, if the wheels lock up, the driver loses the ability to steer the car. ABS prevents wheel lock-up, allowing the driver to steer while still applying maximum braking force.

2. Shorter Stopping Distances on Slippery Surfaces

ABS can help reduce stopping distances on low-traction surfaces, such as wet, icy, or gravel roads. On these surfaces, braking can easily cause wheels to lock, increasing stopping distances. ABS continually modulates brake pressure to prevent locking, which can shorten the overall stopping distance.

3. Reduced Risk of Skidding

On slippery roads, ABS prevents the wheels from locking, significantly reducing the risk of the vehicle skidding. By ensuring that the tires continue to rotate, ABS allows the driver to maintain more control over the vehicle, even in challenging weather conditions.

4. Improved Performance in Emergency Braking

ABS systems are particularly useful in emergency situations. In scenarios where hard braking is needed, ABS can help prevent skidding, giving the driver a better chance of avoiding a collision.

Limitations and Considerations of ABS

While ABS provides significant safety benefits, there are some limitations:

1. Reduced Effectiveness on Loose Gravel or Sand

ABS is less effective on loose surfaces such as gravel, sand, or deep snow. Since the system is designed to prevent wheel lock-up, it can sometimes make it more difficult for the wheels to dig into loose surfaces and provide the necessary traction to stop the vehicle. In these conditions, it may be beneficial to drive at lower speeds and apply gentle braking instead of relying solely on ABS.

2. Longer Stopping Distances on Dry Roads

On dry, hard surfaces, ABS may increase stopping distances compared to traditional braking. In normal driving conditions, where traction is good, the wheels don’t typically lock up, and traditional braking can provide shorter stopping distances. ABS may apply and release brake pressure in quick bursts, which can result in a slightly longer stopping distance on dry roads.

3. Pedal Pulsation

One common complaint drivers have when ABS is activated is the sensation of pedal pulsation. As the system rapidly modulates brake pressure, the brake pedal will often vibrate or pulsate underfoot. This can be unnerving for some drivers, but it’s important to note that this is a normal part of the ABS system’s operation.

Conclusion

ABS was a groundbreaking safety feature that has significantly improved the performance and safety of vehicles, especially in emergency braking situations.

Categories
Uncategorized

Power Assisted Braking

Power-assisted braking, also known as servo-assisted braking or brake boost, is a braking system that makes it easier for a driver to apply the necessary braking force to stop the vehicle. This system significantly reduces the amount of effort required to press the brake pedal. Power-assisted brakes are found in almost all modern cars, providing the driver with better control, quicker response times, and a safer driving experience.

1. The Basics of Braking Systems

In a standard braking system, when the driver presses the brake pedal, it activates a mechanical linkage that eventually applies pressure to the brake pads or brake shoes. This friction slows the vehicle down by applying force to the wheels, reducing their rotational speed. The amount of force that can be applied through this process is limited by the amount of physical effort the driver can exert on the brake pedal.

Without power assistance, drivers would need to press very hard on the brake pedal to generate enough force to stop the vehicle, especially in a heavy car or at higher speeds. This is where power assistance comes into play, making the braking process much more efficient and requiring much less physical effort from the driver.

2. How Power-Assisted Braking Works

Power-assisted braking uses external energy sources to assist the driver in applying brake force. The energy is typically provided by either the vehicle’s engine (via the vacuum system) or an electric motor. This assists in increasing the amount of force exerted on the brake pads with minimal input from the driver. There are two main types of power-assisted braking systems:

  1. Vacuum-Assisted Braking (Hydraulic Brake Booster)
  2. Electric Brake Boosters (EBB)

2.1. Vacuum-Assisted Braking

The most common form of power-assisted braking, vacuum-assisted braking relies on the engine’s intake vacuum system to provide braking assistance. This type of system is often referred to as a brake booster or vacuum booster.

How It Works:
  • Vacuum Source: The brake booster uses a vacuum created by the engine’s intake manifold to operate. The intake manifold generates a vacuum during the engine’s normal operation. This vacuum is used to apply additional force to the brake master cylinder.
  • Brake Pedal and Master Cylinder: When the driver presses the brake pedal, it pushes a rod into the master cylinder, which in turn activates the brakes. The power brake booster amplifies the force the driver applies to the pedal by using the vacuum pressure.
  • Boosting Action: The vacuum is harnessed in the brake booster to create a pressure difference between two chambers inside the booster. One chamber is exposed to the vacuum, while the other is exposed to atmospheric pressure (via a check valve). The resulting pressure differential helps push a diaphragm inside the booster, which in turn assists the brake master cylinder in applying more force to the brakes with much less effort from the driver.
  • Braking Effect: The result is a reduced effort needed by the driver to stop the vehicle, as the brake booster provides extra force to the brake system. In practice, this means that even light pressure on the brake pedal generates a much stronger braking force.
Advantages of Vacuum-Assisted Braking:
  • Reduced Pedal Force: This system greatly reduces the amount of physical force required by the driver to apply the brakes.
  • Quicker Response: The brake booster amplifies the braking force instantly, allowing for more responsive and effective braking.
  • Fuel Efficiency: Since the vacuum is created from the engine’s intake system, there is no additional power drain from a separate pump or energy source.
Disadvantages of Vacuum-Assisted Braking:
  • Engine Dependency: This system relies on the engine to generate vacuum, so it may not function properly if the engine stalls or is not running.
  • Potential for Failure: If there is a vacuum leak, the brake booster may not provide enough assistance, making braking more difficult and potentially dangerous.

2.2. Electric Brake Boosters (EBB)

Electric brake boosters are a newer technology that utilizes an electric motor rather than vacuum pressure to assist in braking.

How It Works:
  • Electric Motor: Instead of relying on a vacuum, an electric motor is used to power a hydraulic pump or directly actuate the brake system. The electric motor is activated when the driver applies pressure to the brake pedal.
  • Hydraulic Pump or Actuation: In electric brake boosters, the motor typically drives a hydraulic pump, which increases the pressure in the brake lines to assist in braking. Alternatively, some systems use the motor to directly control the brake actuators.
  • Brake Pedal Feedback: Some electric brake boosters also provide feedback to the driver to simulate the feel of traditional braking. The system adjusts the brake force based on the vehicle’s speed, the force applied to the pedal, and the driving conditions.
Advantages of Electric Brake Boosters:
  • Independence from Engine: Unlike vacuum-assisted systems, electric brake boosters do not rely on engine vacuum and can function even when the engine is not running.
  • Flexibility in Design: Electric brake boosters are easier to integrate into modern vehicle architectures.
  • Efficiency: Electric systems can be more energy-efficient, since the braking force can be tailored more precisely.
Disadvantages of Electric Brake Boosters:
  • Power Draw: Electric brake boosters require additional electrical power, which can drain the vehicle’s battery in electric or hybrid cars.
  • Cost and Complexity: These systems are generally more complex and expensive to repair or replace compared to traditional vacuum boosters.

3. The Role of Power-Assisted Braking in Vehicle Safety

Power-assisted braking plays a crucial role in the overall safety of modern vehicles by offering several key benefits:

3.1. Reduced Driver Effort

Power-assisted braking makes it easier for drivers to apply sufficient force to the brake pedal, especially in emergencies. This reduces the physical effort required to stop the vehicle, which is particularly important in high-speed or panic-braking situations.

3.2. Shorter Stopping Distances

By boosting the braking force applied to the wheels, power-assisted braking systems enable the vehicle to stop more quickly, reducing stopping distances and improving safety. This is especially vital in adverse weather conditions or when driving at high speeds.

3.3. Better Control and Feel

In addition to reducing effort, power-assisted braking systems provide more precise control over the braking process. This helps ensure smooth deceleration and more effective braking, which improves the overall driving experience.

3.4. Reduced Driver Fatigue

On long drives, or in stop-and-go traffic, the use of power-assisted brakes reduces driver fatigue. Constantly applying pressure to the brake pedal in these situations can be physically tiring, but with power assistance, the effort required is minimized, improving comfort for the driver.

4. Conclusion

Whether through the use of vacuum or electric motors, power-assisted braking allows drivers to stop their vehicles quickly and with minimal effort. This technology enhances driving safety by improving stopping distances, reducing driver fatigue, and providing better control of the vehicle.

Power-assisted braking is standard, and it is an integral part of the vehicle’s overall safety systems. Without it, braking would require significantly more physical effort, especially for heavier vehicles or in emergency situations.

Categories
Uncategorized

Car Demisters

A car demister is an essential component in a vehicle’s climate control system, designed to improve visibility by clearing the windshield and windows of condensation, fog, or frost. This is particularly important for safe driving in various weather conditions such as rain, snow, or humidity, which can cause moisture to accumulate inside the car. In this article, we will explain what a car demister is, how it works and the different types.

A car demister (also known as a defogger or defroster) is a device in vehicles that clears fog, mist, or frost from the windows. It typically works by using the vehicle’s heating and ventilation system to control the temperature and airflow, thereby removing moisture buildup. The demister is most commonly used on the front windshield and side windows, although some vehicles may also have rear window demisters.

There are two main types of demisters in modern vehicles:

  1. Front Windshield Demisters – These are designed to clear fog from the inside of the windshield to improve the driver’s visibility. The air is directed onto the glass to warm it or remove moisture.
  2. Rear Window Demisters – These are typically electrically heated grids or elements built into the rear window to clear any condensation or frost that might build up.

The process of demisting involves reducing the amount of moisture on the glass, typically through temperature regulation and airflow. Let’s break down the science behind how this works:

Condensation occurs when moist air inside the car comes into contact with the cold surface of the windows. This happens because cool air can hold less moisture than warm air. When warm, moist air meets the cold window, the moisture in the air condenses onto the surface of the glass, creating fog or mist.

Similarly, in winter conditions, frost can form on windows when moist air freezes on the surface of the glass. This can further obstruct visibility and is dangerous if not properly addressed.

The key to the demisting process is using warm air to reduce the condensation. Warm air can hold more moisture than cold air, which allows the air to absorb the moisture on the glass and carry it away.

To achieve this, the car’s heating and ventilation system is used in combination with airflow directed at the windows. The warm air circulates across the surface of the glass, causing the moisture to evaporate and dissipate into the cabin air. The evaporated moisture is then vented out of the car through the vehicle’s air conditioning system or external vents.

In most vehicles, the air is directed toward the windshield and front windows via vents located at the dashboard or near the driver’s seat. These vents allow for optimal airflow that ensures the warm air directly contacts the glass surface. By increasing the temperature and airflow, the moisture trapped on the glass evaporates faster.

A car’s demister system consists of a few key components working together to clear moisture from the windows. These components include:

The heater core is part of the vehicle’s cooling system and serves as a heat exchanger. It allows hot coolant from the engine to warm the air that passes through it. The heater core sends warm air into the cabin, which is then directed toward the windows to help with demisting.

The blower fan is responsible for circulating air through the vehicle’s ventilation system. The fan directs the warm air from the heater core toward the windshield and windows. It is essential for ensuring that the airflow is strong enough to remove moisture from the glass effectively.

The air conditioning system, in addition to cooling the air, can also play a key role in demisting. A/C systems work by dehumidifying the air as it circulates, removing moisture and lowering humidity inside the cabin. In winter or humid conditions, the A/C can be turned on in conjunction with the heater to reduce moisture buildup, even without actively cooling the air.

Defrost vents are typically located near the base of the windshield. These vents are specifically designed to direct warm air toward the glass and prevent condensation from forming on the windshield. The design of the vehicle’s dashboard often includes defrost vents for both the driver and passenger side windows.

A front windshield demister works by directing warm air or dry air toward the windshield, typically from the vehicle’s ventilation system. Here’s how the process works step-by-step:

  1. Activate the Defrost Mode: The driver activates the defrost mode on the vehicle’s climate control system. This can be done by adjusting the airflow settings and selecting the windshield icon on the dashboard. In most cases, the climate control system automatically adjusts the temperature and airflow direction to focus on the windshield.
  2. Warm Air Circulates: Once activated, the heater core heats up the air, and the blower fan pushes the warm air through vents that direct it toward the windshield and front side windows. The warm air increases the temperature of the glass and helps to reduce condensation or frost.
  3. Evaporation of Moisture: As the warm air hits the glass, the moisture or fog on the windshield begins to evaporate. The air, now humidified with moisture from the glass, is directed out of the cabin through vents or the air conditioning system.
  4. Clearing the Glass: The result is a cleared windshield and side windows, improving visibility and making it safer for the driver to operate the vehicle.

A rear window demister typically operates on a different principle than the front windshield demister. Instead of using heated air, rear window demisters use electrically heated wires embedded in the rear window. Here’s how it works:

  1. Electric Grid Heating: The rear window demister is made up of a series of fine, electrically conductive wires embedded into the rear glass. These wires act like heating elements that generate heat when an electrical current passes through them.
  2. Heating the Glass: Once activated (usually via a button or switch on the dashboard), the electric current flows through these wires, causing them to heat up. The heat generated by the wires helps to melt the condensation or frost on the rear window, allowing it to evaporate or drip off.
  3. Clearing the Window: As the rear window heats up, moisture, fog, or frost melts and clears, providing better visibility for the driver, especially when reversing or driving in adverse weather conditions.

A functional demister is essential for several reasons:

The primary function of a demister is to improve visibility by clearing condensation, fog, or frost from the windows. A clear windshield and side windows allow the driver to see clearly and navigate safely, reducing the risk of accidents.

Driving with foggy, misted, or frosted windows significantly impairs a driver’s ability to respond to road hazards. A properly functioning demister ensures the driver can maintain a clear line of sight and avoid accidents caused by poor visibility.

Apart from safety, the demister also contributes to overall comfort inside the cabin. In cold weather, the ability to quickly clear frost or condensation allows passengers to enjoy a comfortable cabin environment without delays.

The car demister is a vital safety feature that plays a crucial role in keeping the driver’s line of sight clear during adverse weather conditions. Whether it’s clearing fog from the windshield or melting frost from the rear window, the demister system uses the vehicle’s heating and ventilation system to maintain visibility and safety.

Categories
Uncategorized

The 1970’s Oil Crisis

The 1970s fuel crisis was a pivotal moment in modern history. It shook the foundations of global energy security and reshaped economies, politics, and societal norms. Characterized by skyrocketing oil prices, fuel shortages, and long lines at gas stations, the crisis had far-reaching consequences.

Causes of the Fuel Crisis

Several factors contributed to the fuel crisis of the 1970s. These included geopolitical tensions, economic policies, and technological limitations.

  1. OPEC Embargo: One of the primary catalysts for the fuel crisis was the decision by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) to impose an oil embargo. They did so on countries that supported Israel during the Yom Kippur War in October 1973. This embargo led to a sharp reduction in oil supplies and triggered a surge in oil prices worldwide.
  2. Energy Security Concerns: The reliance of industrialized nations, particularly the United States, on imported oil. The vulnerability of oil supply chains to geopolitical disruptions exacerbated fears of future oil shortages. It prompted governments to reassess their energy policies.
  3. Decline in Oil Production: Concurrent with the geopolitical tensions, oil production in some major oil-producing regions began to decline, further straining global oil supplies. Aging oil fields, lack of investment in exploration and production, and political instability in oil-rich nations contributed to this decline in oil output.

Impacts of the Fuel Crisis

The fuel crisis of the 1970s had profound effects on various aspects of society, economy, and politics, reshaping the global landscape in significant ways.

  1. Economic Recession: The surge in oil prices and fuel shortages triggered by the crisis led to stagflation—a combination of high inflation and stagnant economic growth—in many countries. Industries reliant on oil, such as transportation, manufacturing, and agriculture, faced significant disruptions, resulting in layoffs, bankruptcies, and economic downturns.
  2. Energy Conservation Measures: In response to the crisis, governments implemented various energy conservation measures to reduce oil consumption and mitigate the impact of fuel shortages. These measures included fuel rationing, speed limits, daylight saving time adjustments, and incentives for energy-efficient technologies.
  3. Shift in Energy Policies: The fuel crisis prompted governments to reassess their energy policies and seek alternative sources of energy to reduce dependence on oil imports. Investments in renewable energy, nuclear power, and domestic oil production increased as countries sought to enhance energy security and diversify their energy portfolios.
  4. Geopolitical Realignment: The fuel crisis reshaped geopolitical dynamics, leading to shifts in alliances and global power structures. Oil-producing nations gained greater leverage in international affairs. Oil-importing countries sought to strengthen diplomatic ties with oil-rich regions and reduce dependence on volatile oil markets.
  5. Environmental Awareness: The fuel crisis raised awareness about the environmental impacts of fossil fuel consumption. This in turn spurred interest in sustainable energy solutions. Concerns about air pollution, carbon emissions, and climate change prompted calls for stricter environmental regulations and investments in clean energy technologies.

Lessons Learned

The fuel crisis of the 1970s served as a wake-up call for the world. It highlighted the vulnerabilities of global energy systems and the need for more resilient and sustainable energy policies.

  1. Energy Diversification: The crisis underscored the importance of diversifying energy sources and reducing reliance on fossil fuels. Investing in renewable energy, nuclear power, and energy efficiency measures can enhance energy security. It can also mitigate the impact of future supply disruptions.
  2. Geopolitical Stability: Political instability in oil-producing regions can have far-reaching consequences for global energy markets. Building diplomatic relationships and promoting peace and stability is important. Especially in volatile regions, this can help reduce the risk of geopolitical conflicts disrupting oil supplies.
  3. Conservation and Efficiency: Energy conservation and efficiency measures play a crucial role in reducing oil consumption. It can also mitigate the impact of fuel shortages. Encouraging individuals and businesses to adopt energy-saving practices can help minimize the economic and environmental consequences of energy crises.
  4. Sustainable Development: Pursuing sustainable development strategies. Strategies that balance economic growth with environmental protection is essential for long-term energy security and prosperity. Investing in clean energy technologies, promoting energy conservation, and fostering innovation can pave the way for a more sustainable and resilient energy future.

Conclusion: The fuel crisis of the 1970s reshaped the global energy landscape. It influenced policies, economies, and societies around the world. While the crisis brought about economic hardship and geopolitical tensions, it also spurred innovation, conservation efforts, and a renewed focus on sustainable energy solutions.

Categories
Uncategorized

Total Falcon sales as a percentage of models

What we have done here is taken total Ford Falcon sales from 1960 to 2016 and figured out how much each model contributes to that as a percentage.Between 1960 and 2016, 3 573 635 Ford Falcon models were produced and sold in Australia. We have listed the Falcon models in order of how many were sold.

1.XF Falcon

Number Built: 278 101

Percentage of Falcon models: 7.8%

2. AU Falcon

Number Built: 237 701

Percentage of Falcon models: 6.7%

3. EA Falcon

Number Built: 223 612

Percentage of Falcon models: 6.3%

4. XB Falcon

Number Built: 220 765 (including GT)

Percentage of Falcon models: 6.2%

5. XD Falcon

Number Built: 206 974

Percentage of Falcon models: 5.8%

6. BA Falcon

Number Built: 196 023

Percentage of Falcon models: 5.5%

7. XE Falcon

Number Built: 193 890

Percentage of Falcon models: 5.4%

8. EF Falcon

Number Built : 192 100

Percentage of Falcon models: 5.4%

9. FG Falcon:

Number Built: 191 314

Percentage of Falcon models: 5.4%

10. XA Falcon

Number Built: 152 609 (including GT)

Percentage of Falcon models: 4.3%

11. XC Falcon

Number Built: 150 707 (including Cobra)

Percentage of Falcon models: 4.2%

12. BF Falcon

Number Built: 136 473

Percentage of Falcon models: 3.8%

13. EL Falcon

Number Built: 133 461

Percentage of Falcon models: 3.7%

14. EB Falcon

Number Built: 121 221

Percentage of Falcon models: 3.4%

15: XY Falcon

Number Built: 118 666 (including GT)

Percentage of Falcon models: 3.3%

16: XW Falcon

Number Built: 105 785 (including GT)

Percentage of Falcon models: 3.0%

17: XR Falcon

Number Built: 90 810 (including GT)

Percentage of Falcon models: 2.5%

18: XT Falcon

Number Built: 79 290 (including GT)

Percentage of Falcon models: 2.2%

19: XL Falcon

Number Built: 75 705

Percentage of Falcon models: 2.1%

20: ED Falcon

Number Built: 72 571

Percentage of Falcon models: 2.0%

21: XP Falcon

Number Built: 70 954

Percentage of Falcon models: 2.0%

22: XK Falcon

Number Built: 68 413

Percentage of Falcon models: 1.9%

23: XM Falcon

Number Built: 47 132

Percentage of Falcon models: 1.3%

24: FG-X Falcon:

Number Built: 11 570

Percentage of Falcon models: 0.3%

Categories
Uncategorized

Time in production as a percentage

The Ford Falcon was introduced to Australia in September 1960. The last Ford Falcon rolled off the lot in October 2016. The Ford Falcon was produced in Australia for 672 months. What we have done here is listed all Falcon models and how long they were in production for, in months. Then we found out what percentage of the 672 months each of the Falcon models were in production for.

XK Falcon

In production for about 23 months

Percentage of time in production: 3.4%

XL Falcon

In production for about 18 months

Percentage of time in production: 2.7%

XM Falcon

In production for about 12 months

Percentage of time in production: 1.7%

XP Falcon

In production for about 19 months

Percentage of time in production: 2.8%

XR Falcon

In production for about 18 months

Percentage of time in production: 2.7%

XT Falcon

In production for about 14 months

Percentage of time in production: 2.1%

XW Falcon

In production for about 29 months

Percentage of time in production: 4.3%

XY Falcon

In production for about 15 months

Percentage of time in production: 2.2%

XA Falcon

In production for about 22 months

Percentage of time in production: 3.3%

XB Falcon

In production for about 22 months

Percentage of time in production: 3.3%

XC Falcon

In production for about 32 months

Percentage of time in production: 4.8%

XD Falcon

In production for about 36 months

Percentage of time in production: 5.4%

XE Falcon

In production for about 31 months

Percentage of time in production: 4.6%

XF Falcon

In production for about 28 months

Percentage of time in production: 4.2%

EA Falcon

In production for about 41 months

Percentage of time in production: 6.1%

EB Falcon

In production for about 25 months

Percentage of time in production: 3.7%

ED Falcon

In production for about 12 months

Percentage of time in production: 1.8%

EF Falcon

In production for about 25 months

Percentage of time in production: 3.7%

EL Falcon

In production for about 23 months

Percentage of time in production: 3.4%

AU Falcon

In production for about 48 months

Percentage of time in production: 7.1%

BA Falcon

In production for about 37 months

Percentage of time in production: 5.5%

BF Falcon

In production for about 28 months. Wagons in production for about 56 months

Percentage of time in production (excluding wagons): 4.1%

FG Falcon

In production for 78 months

Percentage of time in production: 11.6%

FG-X Falcon

In production for 24 months

Percentage of time in production: 3.6%

Categories
Uncategorized

Housing prices when each Falcon model was released

Here we have put together a post contrasting housing prices and comparing them to the cost of a new Ford Falcon the year it was released. The housing prices we have used are the median housing prices in Sydney, the Ford Falcon prices used are base model manual sedan where possible. What we have done after that is take the house cost and divided it by the new car price to give us a ratio which shows the affordability of a new Ford Falcon compared to the Sydney median house price. For example, a ratio of 5:1 tells us that the Sydney median house price is 5 times the price of a new falcon or, for the cost of 5 new Falcons, you could buy at the median house price in Sydney. The reason Sydney has been chosen is because it was the only set of reliable statistics we could find going back to 1960.

1960

XK Falcon: £1 137 ($2 274)

Sydney Median House price: $9 500

Ratio: 4.2:1

1962

XL Falcon: £1 070 ($2 140)

Sydney Median House price: $9 240

Ratio: 4.3:1

1964

XM Falcon: £1 051 ($2 102)

Sydney Median House price: $12 030

Ratio: 5.7:1

1965

XP Falcon: £1 075 ($2 150)

Sydney Median House price: $12 700

Ratio: 5.9:1

1966

XR Falcon: $2 226

Sydney Median House price: $13 310

Ratio: 6.0:1

1968

XT Falcon: $2 330

Sydney Median House price: $15 120

Ratio: 6.5:1

1969

XW Falcon: $2 320

Sydney Median House price: $16 380

Ratio: 7.1:1

1970

XY Falcon: $2 435

Sydney Median House price: $17 750

Ratio: 7.3:1

1972

XA Falcon: $2 750

Sydney Median House price: $23 460

Ratio: 8.5:1

1973

XB Falcon: $3 236

Sydney Median House price: $27 130

Ratio: 8.4:1

1976

XC Falcon: $5 456

Sydney Median House price: $36 430

Ratio: 6.7:1

1979

XD Falcon: $6 600

Sydney Median House price: $50 190

Ratio: 7.6:1

1982

XE Falcon: $9 758

Sydney Median House price: $78 630

Ratio: 8.1:1

1984

XF Falcon: $12 007

Sydney Median House price: $87 470

Ratio: 7.3:1

1988

EA Falcon: $19 431

Sydney Median House price: $136 390

Ratio: 7.0:1

1991

EB Falcon: $24 042

Sydney Median House price: $189 090

Ratio: 7.9:1

1993

ED Falcon: $25 255

Sydney Median House price: $197 250

Ratio: 7.8:1

1994

EF Falcon: $27 035

Sydney Median House price: $206 720

Ratio: 7.6:1

1996

EL Falcon: $29 594

Sydney Median House price: $220 000

Ratio: 7.4:1

1998

AU Falcon: $29 990

Sydney Median House price: $272 000

Ratio: 9.1:1

2002

BA Falcon: $33 640

Sydney Median House price: $452 000

Ratio: 13.4:1

2005

BF Falcon: $34 880

Sydney Median House price: $528 000

Ratio: 15.1:1

2008

FG Falcon: $45 790

Sydney Median House price: $546 000

Ratio: 11.9:1

2014

FG-X Falcon: $35 900

Sydney Median House price: $811 000

Ratio: 22.6:1

Categories
Uncategorized

Total sales vs population

Total sales of each car model compared to the Australian population at the times. What we have done is taken Australian population figures from the year each Falcon model was released and divided it by the number of Falcons sold of the model that was released that year.

XK Falcon: September 1960

Australian population in 1960: 10.28 million

XK Falcon sales: 68 413

1 XK Falcon for approximately every 150 Australians

XL Falcon: August 1962

Australian population in 1962: 10.74 million

XL Falcon sales: 75 705

1 XL Faclon for approximately every 142 Australians

XM Falcon: February 1964

Australian population in 1964: 11.17 million

XM Falcon sales: 47 132

1 XM Falcon for approximately every 237 Australians

XP Falcon: March 1965

Australian population in 1965: 11.39 million

XP Falcon sales: 70 954

1 XP Falcon for approximately every 161 Australians

XR Falcon: September 1966

Australian population in 1966: 11.65 million

XR Falcon sales: 90 810

1 XR Falcon for approximately every 128 Australians

XT Falcon: March 1968

Australian population in 1968: 12.01 million

XT Falcon sales: 79 290

1 XT Falcon for approximately every 151 Australians

XW Falcon: June 1969

Australian population in 1969: 12.26 million

XW Falcon sales: 105 785

1 XW Falcon for approximately every 116 Australians

XY Falcon: October 1970

Australian population in 1970: 12.51 million

XY Falcon sales: 118 666

1 XY Falcon for approximately every 105 Australians

XA Falcon: March 1972

Australian population in 1972: 13.18 million

XA Falcon sales: 152 609

1 XA Falcon for approximately every 86 Australians

XB Falcon: September 1973

Australian population in 1973: 13.38 million

XB Falcon sales: 220 765

1 XB Falcon for approximately every 61 Australians

XC Falcon: July 1976

Australian population in 1976: 14.03 million

XC Falcon sales: 150 707

1 XC Falcon for approximately every 93 Australians

XD Falcon: March 1979

Australian population in 1979: 14.51 million

XD Falcon sales: 206 974

1 XD Falcon for approximately every 70 Australians

XE Falcon: March 1982

Australian population in 1982: 15.18 million

XE Falcon sales: 193 890

1 XE Falcon for approximately every 78 Australians

XF Falcon: October 1984

Australian population in 1984: 15.54 million

XF Falcon sales: 278 101

1 XF Falcon for approximately every 56 Australians

EA Falcon: March 1988

Australian population in 1988: 16.53 million

EA Falcon sales: 223 612

1 EA Falcon for approximately every 74 Australians

EB Falcon: October 1991

Australian population in 1991: 17.28 million

EB Falcon sales: 121 221

1 EB Falcon for approximately every 143 Australians

ED Falcon August 1993

Australian population in 1993: 17.67 million

ED Falcon sales: 72 571

1 ED Falcon for approximately every 243 Australians

EF Falcon: August 1994

Australian population in 1994: 17.86 million

EF Falcon sales: 192 100

1 EF Falcon for approximately every 93 Australians

EL Falcon: March 1996

Australian population in 1996: 18.31 million

EL Falcon sales: 133 461

1 EL Falcon for approximately every 137 Australians

AU Falcon: September 1998

Australian population in 1998: 18.71 million

AU Falcon sales: 237 701

1 AU Falcon for approximately every 79 Australians

BA Falcon: September 2002

Australian population in 2002: 19.65 million

BA Falcon sales: 196 023

1 BA Falcon for approximately every 100 Australians

BF Falcon: October 2005

Australian population in 2005: 20.39 million

BF Falcon sales: 136 473

1 BF Falcon for approximately every 149 Australians

FG Falcon: March 2008

Australian population in 2008: 21.25 million

FG Falcon sales: 191 314

I FG Falcon for approximately every 111 Australians

FG-X Falcon: October 2014

Australian population in 2014: 23.48 million

FG-X Falcon sales: 11 570

1 FG-X Falcon for approximately every 2 029 Australians

Categories
Uncategorized

Petrol prices vs new car prices

Here we have put together a bit of a write up comparing the cost of petrol when each Falcon model was released up against the new car price. We have worked out how the price of petrol compares to the price of the new car by showing how many litres of petrol it would have costs to buy that model Falcon. All price in $AUD. Petrol prices quoted are in cents. Beware that decimal currency was not brought out until 1966 (XR Falcon), however it has been converted.

1960 XK Falcon:

New car price in 1960: £1 137 ($2 274)

Petrol price in 1960: 7.79

Litres of petrol needed to buy XK Falcon in 1960: 29 191 Litres

1962 XL Falcon:

New car price in 1962: £1 070 ($2 140)

Petrol price in 1962: 7.48

Litres of petrol needed to buy XL Falcon in 1962: 28 610 Litres

1964 XM Falcon:

New car price in 1964: £1 051 ($2 102)

Petrol price in 1964: 7.43

Litres of petrol needed to buy XM Falcon in 1964: 28 291 Litres

1965 XP Falcon:

New car price in 1965: £1 075 ($2 150)

Petrol price in 1965: 7.41

Litres of petrol needed to buy XP Falcon in 1965: 29 015 Litres

1966 XR Falcon:

New car price in 1966: $2 226

Petrol price in 1966: 7.99

Litres of petrol needed to buy XR Falcon in 1966: 27 860 Litres

1968 XT Falcon:

New car price in 1968: $2 330

Petrol price in 1968: 8.52

Litres of petrol needed to buy XT Falcon in 1968: 27 374 Litres

1969 XW Falcon:

New car price in 1969: $2 320

Petrol price in 1969: 8.56

Litres of petrol needed to buy XW Falcon in 1969: 27 103 Litres

1970 XY Falcon:

New car price in 1970: $2 435

Petrol price in 1970: 8.73

Litres of petrol needed to buy XY Falcon in 1970: 27 892 Litres

1972 XA Falcon:

New car price in 1972: $2 750

Petrol price in 1972: 10.10

Litres of petrol needed to buy XA Falcon in 1972: 27 228 Litres

1973 XB Falcon

New car price in 1973: $3 236

Petrol price in 1973: 10.10

Litres of petrol needed to buy XB Falcon in 1973: 32 040 Litres

1976 XC Falcon:

New car price in 1976: $5 456

Petrol price in 1976: 16.16

Litres of petrol needed to buy XC Falcon in 1976: 33 762 Litres

1979 XD Falcon:

New car price in 1979: $6 600

Petrol price in 1979: 22.58

Litres of petrol needed to buy XD Falcon in 1979: 29 229 Litres

1982 XE Falcon:

New car price in 1982: $9 758

Petrol price in 1982: 35.95

Litres of petrol needed to buy XE Falcon in 1982: 27 143 Litres

1984 XF Falcon:

New car price in 1984: $12 007

Petrol price in 1984: 46.08

Litres of petrol needed to buy XF Falcon in 1984: 26 057 Litres

1988 EA Falcon:

New car price in 1988: $19 431

Petrol price in 1988: 54.73

Litres of petrol needed to buy EA Falcon in 1988: 35 503 Litres

1991 EB Falcon:

New car price in 1991: $24 042

Petrol price in 1991: 69.43

Litres of petrol needed to buy EB Falcon in 1991: 34 628 Litres

1993 ED Falcon:

New car price in 1993: $25 255

Petrol price in 1993: 68.14

Litres of petrol needed to buy ED Falcon in 1993: 37 063 Litres

1994 EF Falcon:

New car price in 1994: $27 035

Petrol price in 1994: 67.00

Litres of petrol needed to buy EF Falcon in 1994: 40 754 Litres

1996 EL Falcon:

New car price in 1996: $29 594

Petrol price in 1996: 70.65

Litres of petrol needed to buy EL Falcon in 1996: 41 888 Litres

1998 AU Falcon:

New car price in 1998: $29 990

Petrol price in 1998: 70.62

Litres of petrol needed to buy AU Falcon in 1998: 42 467 Litres

2002 BA Falcon:

New car price in 2002: $33 640

Petrol price in 2002: 83.80

Litres of petrol needed to buy BA Falcon in 2002: 40 143 Litres

2005 BF Falcon:

New car price in 2005: $34 880

Petrol price in 2005: 101.62

Litres of petrol needed to buy BF Falcon in 2005: 34 324 Litres

2008 FG Falcon:

New car price in 2008: $45 790

Petrol price in 2008: 135.02

Litres of petrol needed to buy FG Falcon in 2008: 33 913 Litres

2014 FG-X Falcon:

New car price in 2014: $35 900

Petrol price in 2014: 150.64

Litres of petrol needed to buy FG-X Falcon in 2014: 23 831 Litres

Categories
Uncategorized

Price Changes from model to model

XK Falcon

Prices at Time of Introduction: Starting from £1 137 ($2 274) for a Manual 144 sedan

XL Falcon

Prices at Time of Introduction: Manual Sedan: £1070 ($2140)

Price increase from XK to XL: -₤67 ($134)

Price increase from XK to XL: -6%

XM Falcon

Price at time of introduction: Manual Sedan: £1051 ($2102)

Price increase from XL to XM: -₤19 ($38)

Price increase from XL to XM: -2%

XP Falcon

Prices at Time of Introduction: Manual Sedan: £1075 ($2150)

Price increase from XM to XP: ₤24 ($48)

Price increase from XM to XP: 2%

XR Falcon

Prices at Time of Introduction: Falcon Manual Sedan $2 226

Note: Decimal Currency Introduced in 1966 (February 14, 1966)

Price increase from XP to XR: $76

Price increase from XP to XR: 4%

XT Falcon

Prices at Time of Introduction: Falcon Sedan: $2 230

Price increase from XR to XT: $4

Price increase from XR to XT: 0%

XW Falcon

Prices at Time of Introduction: Falcon Sedan $2 320

Price increase from XT to XW: $90

Price increase from XT to XW: 4%

XY Falcon

Prices at Time of Introduction: Falcon Sedan: $2 435

Price increase from XW to XY: $115

Price increase from XW to XY: 5%

XA Falcon

Prices at Time of Introduction: Prices from $2 750 for a manual Falcon Sedan

Price increase from XY to XA: $315

Price increase from XY to XA: 13%

XB Falcon

Prices at Time of Introduction: Falcon Sedan $3 236

Price increase from XA to XB: $486

Price increase from XA to XB: 18%

XC Falcon

Prices at Time of Introduction: Manual Falcon Sedan $5 456

Price increase from XB to XC: $2 220

Price increase from XB to XC: 69%

XD Falcon

Prices at Time of Introduction: Falcon GL Sedan: $6 660

Price increase from XC to XD: $1 204

Price increase from XC to XD: 22%

XE Falcon

Prices at Time of Introduction: GL Sedan: $9 758

Price increase from XD to XE: $3098

Price increase from XD to XE: 47%

XF Falcon

Prices at Time of Introduction: GL Manual Sedan $12 007

Price increase from XE to XF: $2 249

Price increase from XE to XF: 23%

EA Falcon

Prices at Time of Introduction: GL Sedan $19 431

Price increase from XF to EA: $7 424

Price increase from XF to EA: 62%

EB Falcon

Prices at Time of Introduction: Manual GL Sedan: $24 042

Price increase from EA to EB: $4 611

Price increase from EA to EB: 24%

ED Falcon

Prices at Time of Introduction: Falcon GLi Sedan $25 255  

Price increase from EB to ED: $1 213

Price increase from EB to ED: 5%

EF Falcon

Prices at Time of Introduction: Falcon GLi sedan: $27 035

Price increase from ED to EF: $1 780

Price increase from ED to EF: 7%

EL Falcon

Prices at Time of Introduction: Falcon Gli 4.0L Sedan: $30 304

Price increase from EF to EL: $3 269

Price increase from EF to EL: 12%

AU Falcon

Prices at introduction: From $29 990 For A Manual Falcon Forte 4.0L Sedan

Price increase from EL to AU: -$314

Price increase from EL to AU:  -1%

BA Falcon

Prices at Introduction: Falcon XT 4.0 litre sedan: $33 640

Price increase from AU to BA: $3 650

Price increase from AU to BA: 12%

BF Falcon

Prices at New: Manual XT Sedan: $34 880

Price increase from BA to BF: $1 240

Price increase from BA to BF: 4%

FG Falcon

Prices at new: 4.0L Falcon: $35 900

Price increase from BF to FG: $1 020

Price increase from BF to FG: 3%

FG-X Falcon

Prices at new: 4.0L Falcon: $35 900

Price increase from FG to FG-X: $0

Price increase from FG to FG-X: 0%

error: Nope